|
Table 2. Potential Impacts of Act 24 of 2001 on Earned Income Tax Rates |
||||
|
School Districts in the County |
||||
|
County |
Number with Possible Increase |
Percent of All School Districts with Potential Change |
Average Possible Increase in Earned Income Tax Rate |
Maximum Possible Increase in County |
|
ADAMS |
6 |
100% |
0.56 |
0.70 |
|
ALLEGHENY |
6 |
14% |
0.00 |
0.05 |
|
ARMSTRONG |
2 |
50% |
0.05 |
0.15 |
|
BEAVER |
1 |
7% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
BEDFORD |
1 |
20% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
BERKS |
2 |
11% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
BLAIR |
5 |
71% |
0.04 |
0.15 |
|
BRADFORD |
7 |
100% |
0.34 |
0.60 |
|
BUCKS |
3 |
23% |
0.07 |
0.40 |
|
BUTLER |
2 |
29% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
CAMBRIA |
5 |
42% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
CAMERON |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
CARBON |
2 |
40% |
0.19 |
0.50 |
|
CENTRE |
4 |
100% |
0.51 |
0.85 |
|
CHESTER |
1 |
8% |
0.01 |
0.15 |
|
CLARION |
5 |
71% |
0.14 |
0.30 |
|
CLEARFIELD |
2 |
25% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
CLINTON |
1 |
100% |
0.45 |
0.45 |
|
COLUMBIA |
6 |
100% |
0.46 |
0.70 |
|
CRAWFORD |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
CUMBERLAND |
8 |
100% |
0.58 |
0.85 |
|
DAUPHIN |
9 |
90% |
0.47 |
0.80 |
|
DELAWARE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
ELK |
3 |
100% |
0.40 |
0.50 |
|
ERIE |
5 |
38% |
0.02 |
0.05 |
|
FAYETTE |
1 |
17% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
FOREST |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
FRANKLIN |
2 |
40% |
0.03 |
0.10 |
|
FULTON |
2 |
67% |
0.02 |
0.05 |
|
GREENE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
HUNTINGDON |
1 |
25% |
0.03 |
0.10 |
|
INDIANA |
7 |
100% |
0.32 |
0.40 |
|
JEFFERSON |
3 |
100% |
0.37 |
0.50 |
|
JUNIATA |
1 |
100% |
0.05 |
0.05 |
|
LACKAWANNA |
5 |
50% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
LANCASTER |
4 |
25% |
0.05 |
0.60 |
|
LAWRENCE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
LEBANON |
2 |
33% |
0.07 |
0.40 |
|
LEHIGH |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
LUZERNE |
2 |
18% |
0.00 |
0.05 |
|
LYCOMING |
7 |
88% |
0.58 |
0.75 |
|
MCKEAN |
1 |
20% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
MERCER |
5 |
42% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
MIFFLIN |
1 |
100% |
0.25 |
0.25 |
|
MONROE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
MONTGOMERY |
3 |
14% |
0.01 |
0.20 |
|
MONTOUR |
1 |
100% |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
NORTHAMPTON |
5 |
63% |
0.11 |
0.35 |
|
NORTHUMBERLAND |
6 |
100% |
0.63 |
0.95 |
|
PERRY |
4 |
100% |
0.71 |
0.80 |
|
PIKE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
POTTER |
2 |
40% |
0.05 |
0.20 |
|
SCHUYLKILL |
12 |
100% |
0.29 |
0.65 |
|
SNYDER |
2 |
100% |
0.95 |
1.05 |
|
SOMERSET |
5 |
45% |
0.03 |
0.10 |
|
SULLIVAN |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
SUSQUEHANNA |
1 |
17% |
0.02 |
0.10 |
|
TIOGA |
3 |
100% |
0.53 |
0.65 |
|
UNION |
2 |
100% |
0.90 |
0.90 |
|
VENANGO |
2 |
40% |
0.02 |
0.05 |
|
WARREN |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
WASHINGTON |
4 |
29% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
WAYNE |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
WESTMORELAND |
6 |
35% |
0.01 |
0.05 |
|
WYOMING |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
YORK |
11 |
69% |
0.09 |
0.45 |
|
State Total |
199 |
40% |
||
Go To:
Impacts of Act 24
If you have questions about Pennsylvania local taxes and local tax reform, contact Tim Kelsey or your local Penn State Cooperative Extension office.
Webpage and content developed by Tim Kelsey, Associate Professor of Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Penn State University